Priced between the Athlon II X3 425 and the Core i3-530 – is this processor better than either of them? Is it worth considering?
The Processor
Here’s the Athlon II X3 425.
Here’s the stock heatsink. The heatsink is a taller than the one for the X2 250, just like the one for X4 620.
Here’s the CPU-Z capture of the processor.
Here’s the CPU-Z capture of the processor on overclock, I did a quick 20% overclock and it seemed to work fine, didn’t up the voltage.
Test Setup
The test setup used for this review.
Processor | AMD Athlon II X3 425 |
RAM | OCZ 1066mhz 4GB Dual-Channel Kit |
Motherboard | MSI 770-C45 |
Graphic card | Galaxy GT220 1GB DDR3 |
Cooler | Stock heatsink |
Monitor | 20″ Dell Ultra-sharp Wide-screen LCD |
Power Supply | Gigabyte Odin GT 550w |
Operating System | Windows 7 32bit |
Benchmarks
The Athlon II X3 425 is benched in both stock and overclocked state, it will be compared to the Athlon II X4 620 and the Intel Core i3-530
Super PI 1.5 Mod
The value chosen for Super PI was 1M.
X3 425 | X3 425 OC | X4 620 | i3-530 |
29.032 | 24.804 | 29.999 | 14.508 |
* Lower the better |
Super PI is a single-core benchmark. The 2.7ghz X3 is ahead of the X4.
CINEBENCH R10
Processor | X3 425 | X3 425 OC | X4 620 | i3-530 |
Rendering (Single CPU) | 2316 | 2768 | 2237 | 3323 |
Rendering (Multiple CPU) | 6178 | 7418 | 8088 | 7511 |
The benchmark was done with default settings. Here’s where you can download MAXON CINEBENCH R10.
Regardless of how it’s overclocked, the X4 still leads the pack in multi-CPU score even when against the overclocked X3, despite being slower in the single CPU score.
The X3 itself on overclock is very close to the 3ghz i3-530 that costs about 50% more.
PCMark Vantage
X3 425 | X3 425 OC | X4 620 | i3-530 |
5090 | 5548 | 5352 | 5392 |
* Higher the better |
X3 425 overtakes everyone only when overclocked.
Fritz Chess Benchmark
Processor | X3 425 | X3 425 OC | X4 620 | i3-530 |
Relative Speed | 9.67 | 12.08 | 12.52 | 17.25 |
Kilo Nodes/second | 4643 | 5797 | 6011 | 8280 |
X3 is still far behind the other 2, even when overclocked.
SiSoft SANDRA Lite
Processor | X3 425 | X3 425 OC | X4 620 | i3-530 |
Aggregate Arithmetic | 27.11 GOPS |
32.66 GOPS |
32.59 GOPS |
34.6 GOPS |
Dhrystone ALU | 27.52 GIPS |
33.22 GIPS |
30.9 GIPS |
36.45 GIPS |
Whetstone iSSE3 | 26.7 GFLOPS |
32 GFLOPS |
34.28 GFLOPS |
32.74 GFLOPS |
Aggregate Multi-Media | 57 MPixel/s |
68.58 MPixel/s |
73.15 MPixel/s |
58.79 MPixel/s |
Multi-Media Int | 79.25 MPixel/s |
95.42 MPixel/s |
101.83 MPixel/s |
64.64 MPixel/s |
Multi-Media Float | 34.64 MPixel/s |
41.75 MPixel/s |
44.46 MPixel/s |
53.00 MPixel/s |
Multi-Media Double | 18.9 MPixel/s |
22.7 MPixel/s |
24.0 MPixel/s |
27.51 MPixel/s |
On its own, the X3 is just behind the other 2. On overclock, the speed compensates for the lack of cores and come pretty close to the X4 620. And in some ways, perform decently compared to the i3-530.
Thermal Performance
Tests were done with the stock heatsink.
Processor | X3 425 | X3 425 OC |
Idle | 30°C | 33°C |
Load | 52°C | 55°C |
Conclusion
Pitting this processor against the X4 620 and i3 530 isn’t exactly fair, after all the X4 620 costs 33% more while the i3-530 costs about 70% more. So considering the performance you get out of this processor, it’s great value for money!
It comes to about RM 80 per core, which is similar to the X4 620. You could say it’s the X4 620 with 3 cores and being 100mhz faster.
4 Comments
Comments are closed.