The Appearance
Card Details
Here’s a summarized detail of the card.
More details at the official product page
Test Setup
The computer setup used for this review.
Processor | Intel Core i5-2500K |
RAM | Kingston 2GB 1600 Dual-Channel Kit |
Motherboard | MSI P67A-GD65 |
Cooler | Intel stock cooler |
Monitor | 20″ Dell Ultra-sharp Wide-screen LCD |
Power Supply | Cooler Master GX 650W |
Operating System | Windows 7 32bit |
Driver Version | nVidia GeForce Driver Release 270.61 |
The Performance
World In Conflict
Graphic Detail : Maximum @ 1680×1050
Card | Average |
ASUS GTX 550 Ti | 45 |
MSI GTS 450 | 34 |
Leadtek GTX 460 | 58 |
Looks like it’s in between the GTS 450 and GTX 460.
Crysis
Graphic Detail : Maximum @ 1680×1050
Card | Average |
ASUS GTX 550 Ti | 18.61 |
MSI GTS 450 | 18.17 |
Leadtek GTX 460 | 24.22 |
Just slightly faster than the GTS 450.
Mafia II
Graphic Detail : Maximum @ 1680×1050
Card | Average |
ASUS GTX 550 Ti | 30 |
MSI GTS 450 | N/A |
Leadtek GTX 460 | 34 |
Looks pretty close.
Furmark
Graphic Detail : Maximum @ 1680×1050
Card | Average |
ASUS GTX 550 Ti | 52 |
MSI GTS 450 | 40 |
Leadtek GTX 460 | 64 |
Again, it’s in between the GTS 450 and GTX 460.
Unigine Heaven 2.0
Graphic Detail : 1680×1050, 4xAA, 16xAF, Tesselation at NORMAL.
Card | Average |
ASUS GTX 550 Ti | 24.5 |
MSI GTS 450 | 20.2 |
Leadtek GTX 460 | 31.8 |
In between, but towards the GTS 450.
Operating Temperature
Furmark was used for graphic card stressing.
Card | Idle (°C) | Load (°C) | Stress (°C) |
ASUS GTX 550 Ti | 36° | 72° | 76° |
Readings were taken when ambient temperature was around 25°C.
– Load, Furmark was run for 1 minute at 1680×1050 with 4xAA.
– Stress, Furmark was run under the Stress Test mode for 5 minutes.
I’m quite surprised at the heat level, considering a GTS 450 is pretty close in power consumption and runs cooler but certainly the heatsink performs admirably, only 4° gain on stress.
Power Consumption
A little more details on the maximum power consumption of the GTX 550 based cards.
System Power Consumption | Maximum (w) |
GTX 550 | 116 |
GTS 450 | 106 |
GTX 460 | 160 |
GTX 470 | 215 |
Conclusion
Asus has a good product here but in my opinion, the nVidia GPU just doesn’t seem attractive. This is something that plagues all brands, must thanks to nVidia’s nonsense naming again. Usually the a model of the latest generation would perform similarly or better than the previous generation’s next step higher model. One would expect a GTX 550 to perform closely to the GTX 460 but this is not the case.
The GTX 550 is crippled with 192bit bus width, the only plus point against the GTX 460 is that it consumes only about 2/3 the power.
Being the premium brand ASUS is, the GTX 550 based graphic card doesn’t seem that attractive, considering one could acquire a GTX 460 card at same or lesser cost. 🙁 So basically ASUS GTX 550 Ti DirectCU TOP is a good product made unappealing because of nVidia’s GTX 550.
Sweet matte black PCB.
any plan to test folding ppd on this vga..? 🙂