<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: goldfries.com Site Updates &#8211; PC Buying Guide Updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldfries.com/site-updates/goldfriescom-site-updates-pc-buying-guide-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldfries.com/site-updates/goldfriescom-site-updates-pc-buying-guide-updated/</link>
	<description>tech blog with a difference</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:10:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldfries</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/site-updates/goldfriescom-site-updates-pc-buying-guide-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-3626</link>
		<dc:creator>goldfries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=214#comment-3626</guid>
		<description>P35 works fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P35 works fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fui</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/site-updates/goldfriescom-site-updates-pc-buying-guide-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator>Fui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=214#comment-3618</guid>
		<description>May I ask, I&#039;m on a tight budget. Should I choose Gigabyte P35 chipset(DS4) or P45?
Or should I save for whole rig instead of getting one components each month?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I ask, I&#8217;m on a tight budget. Should I choose Gigabyte P35 chipset(DS4) or P45?<br />
Or should I save for whole rig instead of getting one components each month?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xcen</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/site-updates/goldfriescom-site-updates-pc-buying-guide-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-3552</link>
		<dc:creator>Xcen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=214#comment-3552</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldfries</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/site-updates/goldfriescom-site-updates-pc-buying-guide-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-3544</link>
		<dc:creator>goldfries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=214#comment-3544</guid>
		<description>If you notice, the low-end setup uses onboard graphic system. 

So yeah, basically I do agree that E2xxx processors are good and even I still keep them BUT if you bring onboard graphic system into consideration then those AMD boards such as those using the AMD780 are still better than that of Intel&#039;s onboard. 

So as you can see, I&#039;m not bringing power usage and overclocking into consideration. The people who are picky on power consumption and overclocking generally wouldn&#039;t even be referring to the guide. :) (yes, i said generally. not all. )

as for how E5xxx compares to X2 - I have not done comparison but there&#039;s plenty over the Internet. I&#039;d say it fares equally well, setup an AMD X2 and Intel PDC E5xxx and put them side by side and you can&#039;t tell the different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you notice, the low-end setup uses onboard graphic system. </p>
<p>So yeah, basically I do agree that E2xxx processors are good and even I still keep them BUT if you bring onboard graphic system into consideration then those AMD boards such as those using the AMD780 are still better than that of Intel&#8217;s onboard. </p>
<p>So as you can see, I&#8217;m not bringing power usage and overclocking into consideration. The people who are picky on power consumption and overclocking generally wouldn&#8217;t even be referring to the guide. <img src='http://www.goldfries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  (yes, i said generally. not all. )</p>
<p>as for how E5xxx compares to X2 &#8211; I have not done comparison but there&#8217;s plenty over the Internet. I&#8217;d say it fares equally well, setup an AMD X2 and Intel PDC E5xxx and put them side by side and you can&#8217;t tell the different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xcen</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/site-updates/goldfriescom-site-updates-pc-buying-guide-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-3540</link>
		<dc:creator>Xcen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=214#comment-3540</guid>
		<description>I that you recommend AMD Athlon X2 rather than Intel Dual Core E2xxx series.

May I know why? If I&#039;m not mistaken their price range is almost the same, but E2xxx can overclock better, have good speeds and the major advantage is that is uses far less power.

And what about the E5xxx series? How does AMD Athlon X2 compare to that?

I&#039;m very curious to find out :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I that you recommend AMD Athlon X2 rather than Intel Dual Core E2xxx series.</p>
<p>May I know why? If I&#8217;m not mistaken their price range is almost the same, but E2xxx can overclock better, have good speeds and the major advantage is that is uses far less power.</p>
<p>And what about the E5xxx series? How does AMD Athlon X2 compare to that?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very curious to find out <img src='http://www.goldfries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

