Comments on: ASUS ENGTX295 1792MB GDDR3 Graphic Card Review

By: goldfries

goldfries — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:41:28 +0000

good to hear that. if you have more than 2 PCI-E slot then could just put a 9600GT or something for physx. from what I read, a higher level card like 9600GT / 9800GT would be better for handling physx than low-end physx capable cards.

By: stardust

stardust — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:15:51 +0000

nice review mate.

i found that the 4890 in cf performs slightly better than the 295 in terms of performance, gpu core total, and price.

but of course the presence of phys x , cuda , etc are all what makes a game fun to play.

there’s a work around to have phys x on ati but nvidia provided it in one sexy package.

well i guess we are actually paying for the extras.

i’m runnin a cf 4890 rig btw. but borrowed a friends 295 after reading ur review to test it out ^^

By: goldfries

goldfries — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:40:39 +0000

hardware limitations la.

HD4870×2 that time i don’t have HAWX.

i don’t have that many HD4890 to CF also. will see if i can get it done.

By: asamkipas

asamkipas — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:37:41 +0000

nice review from an unbiased person (I hope so) coz so many reviews out there are paid thus creating a sense of favoritism towards either the red or green camp

btw why isnt there any readings at HAWX n furmark for 4870X2 ?

and just as a suggestion,I would like to see how GTX295 fights again 4890 CF =)

Thanks again n keep up da good work

By: goldfries

goldfries — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:29:19 +0000

refer to the “Card Details” section. it’s Nvidia based.

By: Jimmy MRR2

Jimmy MRR2 — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:26:36 +0000

Is this card use ATI chipset? (I don’t know much about graphic card)

By: goldfries

goldfries — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:49:21 +0000

ouh, off-topic but……….. yeah you already know mah.

By: EVo

EVo — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:35:09 +0000

Heyyyy goldfries! came from smashpop’s blog…hey where have i met u before? do tell me i wana know =)