Arctic Cooling MX-2 Thermal Compound Review

September 8th, 2007 | This article was viewed 2,409 times so far...
arcticcoolingmx2

The Package

The Arctic Cooling MX-2 thermal compound comes in a very simple package - just the tube, nothing else unless you consider the nicely printed piece of paper that holds limited information.

Yes, no instruction or anything. It’s simple, usage is like toothpaste, just don’t over-do it. Read on and find out why there isn’t a need for any instruction or application manual.

arcticcoolingmx2
arcticcoolingmx2

The Compound

Here are the highlights of the Arctic Cooling MX-2 thermal compound as found in the official product page.

  • High Thermal Conductivity
  • Low Thermal Resistance
  • Non-Electrical Conductive
  • Non-Capacitive
  • Non-Curing
  • Non-Corrosive
  • No Bleeding
  • Odorless

So why is there not a need for instruction or application manual? Unlike silver and copper compounds such as the Arctic Silver 5, the Arctic Cooling MX-2 thermal compound does not contain any metal particles, therefore there are no problems regarding electrical conductivity and capacitance and it will not result in any damage should it come into contact with parts like electrical traces, pins and leads.

Application & Performance

Application was simple, just as any other thermal compound - just slap a thin layer around the contact area like the processor or GPU chip and that’s it. Emoticon Yes, that doesn’t mean you go careless on applying the compound just because of its non-conductive nature. Emoticon 

arcticcoolingmx2

Here we pit the Arctic Cooling MX-2 (AC MX-2) against the ever-popular Arctic Silver 5 (AS5) and also some unknown white thermal compound. The test was done on a Galaxy 8600GT OC Edition; the compounds were applied and allowed to set in for about 3 days before temperature reading was taken. Ambient temperatures for these tests were around 25°C.

  AC MX-2 AS5 Unknown
Idle 41°C 41°C 42°C
Load 58°C 59°C 62°C

Alright, not much difference there but do bear in mind that this test was done on a graphic card with a rather small copper cooler, and even with that small copper cooler it already shows 1°C difference in temperature. Should it be done on a processor with a decent heatsink, the temperature variance of the MX-2 vs the AS5 would definitely be greater.

Do note that the MX-2 is also the “safer to use” compound. Emoticon 

Conclusion

Regardless of whether you’re planning to use Arctic Cooling MX-2 or Arctic Silver 5, they’re both great thermal compounds but it’s clear that the MX-2 being the better one. The main difference is their chemical composition which could spell trouble if not applied properly.

What I liked about this compound compared to the Arctic Silver 5 besides the better performance is that it is less hard, making it easier to smudge around whichever surface you wish to apply it on. Furthermore it comes in a quite a generous quantity compared to the Arctic Silver 5. Emoticon 

goldfries recommended





Like this article? You can share it to the world with »
Digg StumbleUpon reddit del.icio.us Ma.gnolia Technorati
big divider

Conversations for “Arctic Cooling MX-2 Thermal Compound Review”

  1. Gravatar at goldfries.com bryanyeo87 said :

    i agree with the “The main difference is their chemical composition which could spell trouble if not applied properly” part, try signing your name all over your mobo with AS5 and then see if smoke comes out :p

    great review! Emoticon 

  2. Gravatar at goldfries.com goldfries said :

    Just probably your initials over a strategic part of the board would do the trick. Emoticon 

  3. Gravatar at goldfries.com Thrust said :

    Bro wouldn’t it be better to publish a result that compares MX2, AS5 and without thermal paste applied:P By doing so, we could know the after effect of applying quality thermal paste. Emoticon 

  4. Gravatar at goldfries.com goldfries said :

    Alright. Details added!

  5. Gravatar at goldfries.com goldfries » Galaxy GeForce 8600GT OC Edition Graphic Card Review said :

    [...] Arctic Cooling MX-2 applied on the heatsink, it operated (stock core & memory speed) at 41°C on idle and 58°C on [...]

  6. Gravatar at goldfries.com ilX said :

    haha i juz bought mx2 too
    working very well on my barton 2500+
    bedore that i’m using chapalang t-compound 75C when load
    after mx2 60C when load
    pretty gd t-compound ^^

  7. Gravatar at goldfries.com goldfries said :

    ouhh - Barton, kinda hot. Emoticon 

    Slap on a nice heatsink and it’ll do wonders, which reminds me - I have spare SLK900U / SLK947U. Now I just need to find some Socket A boards to use them on. hehe.

  8. Gravatar at goldfries.com goldfries » Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Heatsink Review said :

    [...] applying a dab of the Arctic Cooling MX-2 on the processor, I proceeded to mount the heatsink. While push-pin installation for LGA775 should [...]

  9. Gravatar at goldfries.com goldfries » Arctic Cooling Accelero S1 and Turbo Module Review said :

    [...] replaced the Arctic Cooling MX-1 that was pre-applied with the Arctic Cooling MX-2 and here are the results, temperature was around 25°C when the readings were [...]

  10. Gravatar at goldfries.com goldfries » Xigmatek HDT-S963 Heatsink Review said :

    [...] applying a dab of the Arctic Cooling MX-2 on the processor, I proceeded to mount the heatsink. Installation was much easier on the S963 as [...]

  11. Gravatar at goldfries.com sub_noob said :

    I like this Tim very much but it have some problem when i applied it on x800gt.. i will get artifact, but not with artic silver 5.. i wonder why..

Have Something To Say?

bottom shade
bottom shade

© 2007 - 2009 goldfries.com | Powered by WordPress | Theme by goldfries | goldfries.com is 587 days old