<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD4830 and HD4770 in Crossfire &#8211; A Worthy Setup?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/</link>
	<description>tech blog with a difference</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:10:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldfries</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>goldfries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=246#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>darn, missed out on the comments - 

@kuntawakaw - sorry don&#039;t have. had some complications. :D btw CF 4830+4850 will work like CF 4830+4830. It will run based on the slower card.

@XiuKeong - as you can see, HD4830 is as good as a HD4890 already. :D so yeah, beats the HD4850 like silly. :D the HD4830 performs close to the HD4850 in fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>darn, missed out on the comments &#8211; </p>
<p>@kuntawakaw &#8211; sorry don&#8217;t have. had some complications. <img src='http://www.goldfries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  btw CF 4830+4850 will work like CF 4830+4830. It will run based on the slower card.</p>
<p>@XiuKeong &#8211; as you can see, HD4830 is as good as a HD4890 already. <img src='http://www.goldfries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  so yeah, beats the HD4850 like silly. <img src='http://www.goldfries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  the HD4830 performs close to the HD4850 in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuntawakaw</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-3925</link>
		<dc:creator>kuntawakaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=246#comment-3925</guid>
		<description>sir...can u pls guess the max power consumption for 4830 cf? i want to cf my setup
and, is there any performance gain if cf 4830+4830 compare 4830+4850?
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir&#8230;can u pls guess the max power consumption for 4830 cf? i want to cf my setup<br />
and, is there any performance gain if cf 4830+4830 compare 4830+4850?<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redzwan</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-3892</link>
		<dc:creator>redzwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 03:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=246#comment-3892</guid>
		<description>thx goldfries for the review...i amaze at what cf 4830 can do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx goldfries for the review&#8230;i amaze at what cf 4830 can do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-3890</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=246#comment-3890</guid>
		<description>Hi I&#039;m Justin I&#039;m new to blogging just like to say I like your site plan to come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I&#8217;m Justin I&#8217;m new to blogging just like to say I like your site plan to come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XiuKeong</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-3889</link>
		<dc:creator>XiuKeong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=246#comment-3889</guid>
		<description>Means getting 4830 CF is much better than His 4850 TurboX? Is it true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Means getting 4830 CF is much better than His 4850 TurboX? Is it true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatty</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>fatty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=246#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>Whoah i&#039;m amazed. Crossfire two 4830 draws less power and perform as good as 4890! Its cheaper somemore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoah i&#8217;m amazed. Crossfire two 4830 draws less power and perform as good as 4890! Its cheaper somemore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xcen</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/hd4830-and-hd4770-in-crossfire-a-worthy-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-3885</link>
		<dc:creator>Xcen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/?p=246#comment-3885</guid>
		<description>Hmm, the 4770 Crossfire performed quite disappointingly compared to 4830. But it&#039;s nice to see how much power is saved when 4770 is used. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, the 4770 Crossfire performed quite disappointingly compared to 4830. But it&#8217;s nice to see how much power is saved when 4770 is used. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

