<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD or Intel - Clearing The Confusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/</link>
	<description>tech blog with a difference</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tv on pc</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-3166</link>
		<dc:creator>tv on pc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-3166</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;17 computer notebook cases...&lt;/strong&gt;

I enjoy reading your blog. I will surely pop by again....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>17 computer notebook cases&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I enjoy reading your blog. I will surely pop by again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldfries</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>goldfries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>Phenom is also different. Reaching 4Ghz on AMD processor is different to that of Intel as they're architecturally different. You'll see a lot of Intel processors reach 4Ghz+++ pretty easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phenom is also different. Reaching 4Ghz on AMD processor is different to that of Intel as they&#8217;re architecturally different. You&#8217;ll see a lot of Intel processors reach 4Ghz+++ pretty easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EGW</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-2913</link>
		<dc:creator>EGW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-2913</guid>
		<description>Because it was “hot n unstable” on air :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it was “hot n unstable” on air&nbsp;<img src="http://www.goldfries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt="Emoticon" class="wp-smiley" />&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-2615</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-2615</guid>
		<description>Why did Phenom need liquid nitrogen just to breach the 4ghz barrier?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did Phenom need liquid nitrogen just to breach the 4ghz barrier?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harsher</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>harsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>AMD processors all the way for me.. from 486 to my AMD AM2 3800+... alot of ppl asked me y i prefer the "hot n unstable" processor... my reply oways worked... "prove to me now the amd processor is hot n unstable"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD processors all the way for me.. from 486 to my AMD AM2 3800+&#8230; alot of ppl asked me y i prefer the &#8220;hot n unstable&#8221; processor&#8230; my reply oways worked&#8230; &#8220;prove to me now the amd processor is hot n unstable&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldfries</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>goldfries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-574</guid>
		<description>The thing I like about AMD setup is that good motherboards aren't expensive, allowing you more leftover $$$ to acquire a better processor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I like about AMD setup is that good motherboards aren&#8217;t expensive, allowing you more leftover $$$ to acquire a better processor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viqq</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>viqq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>You r right.. but I would say that compare the price of a AMD processor vs another Intel processor in the same price range would give you a more appropriate choice. 

In other words, buy the processor that fits your budget the most, either one of them is a good brand and the performance will not go by far although Intels are in no doubt a lil better than AMDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You r right.. but I would say that compare the price of a AMD processor vs another Intel processor in the same price range would give you a more appropriate choice. </p>
<p>In other words, buy the processor that fits your budget the most, either one of them is a good brand and the performance will not go by far although Intels are in no doubt a lil better than AMDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldfries</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>goldfries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-515</guid>
		<description>Well your comparison is not wrong, just that it shouldn't be done on INTEL vs AMD but should be a particular processor vs another processor.

For example, Intel's Pentium Dual-Core range has only 1MB L2 Cache but the Intel Core2Duo E4xxx series has 2MB L2 Cache. On the other hand AMD has generally bigger L1 Cache. 

In short - to suummarize Intel vs AMD like that wouldn't be fair. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well your comparison is not wrong, just that it shouldn&#8217;t be done on INTEL vs AMD but should be a particular processor vs another processor.</p>
<p>For example, Intel&#8217;s Pentium Dual-Core range has only 1MB L2 Cache but the Intel Core2Duo E4xxx series has 2MB L2 Cache. On the other hand AMD has generally bigger L1 Cache. </p>
<p>In short - to suummarize Intel vs AMD like that wouldn&#8217;t be fair.&nbsp;<img src="http://www.goldfries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt="Emoticon" class="wp-smiley" />&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viqq</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>viqq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>It's true that from daily usage such as gaming etc., users really can't tell much about the performance difference because processors nowadays are far from fast nowadays and there are no applications that take advantage of the speed unless there are more power consuming applications in the future, only then you can tell which processor is faster or so.

For me I would just compare which is more energy efficient or performance per watt.

My Intel VS AMD mini comparison:

1. Intel has less Front-side bus speed than AMD but has more cache size than AMD.

2. Intel is more energy efficient than AMD due to the 45nm manufacturing process on their latest processor(Penryn) while AMD has started 65nm on their latest processor(Barcelona).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that from daily usage such as gaming etc., users really can&#8217;t tell much about the performance difference because processors nowadays are far from fast nowadays and there are no applications that take advantage of the speed unless there are more power consuming applications in the future, only then you can tell which processor is faster or so.</p>
<p>For me I would just compare which is more energy efficient or performance per watt.</p>
<p>My Intel VS AMD mini comparison:</p>
<p>1. Intel has less Front-side bus speed than AMD but has more cache size than AMD.</p>
<p>2. Intel is more energy efficient than AMD due to the 45nm manufacturing process on their latest processor(Penryn) while AMD has started 65nm on their latest processor(Barcelona).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Lai</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Lai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfries.com/computing/amd-or-intel-clearing-the-confusion/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Very nice and practical article about CPU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice and practical article about CPU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
